PREFACE
We have all likely heard a lot about Artificial Intelligence
and Chatbots, like ChatGPT. I had no prior usage of any of these Chatbots so I
set out to see if it would be proper to use them in sermon preparation. I
constructed this sermon by entering the following prompt into six of the top
ten AI Chatbots plus one other relatively new one, seven in all.
Prompt: “Please write a 4000 word sermon with outline quoting scripture and biblical principles on why you shouldn't use AI to write a sermon.”
In seconds each Chatbot crafted an outline and a full sermon in accordance with my request.
The irony of my request was not lost on one of the bots (Perplexity) –
It responded like this –
“That’s
a really thoughtful and somewhat ironic request! Writing a 4000-word sermon on why
you shouldn’t use AI to write a sermon (by having AI write one) carries an
inherent paradox. But I understand your intent: you want a comprehensive,
scripture-rooted message that cautions against outsourcing the sacred work of
preaching to Artificial Intelligence.”
So, to be perfectly clear and totally transparent with you, the
words of this sermon are NOT my words. They are a compilation of the
responses of all seven AI bots. I merely cut and pasted them into a document.
Bear in mind, Artificial Intelligence does not innovate; it draws from the
material it finds on the internet and through algorithms structures a report
verbatim of what it found.
I did not write this sermon in the traditional sense. I
merely collated the seven AI responses to organize the flow, add headers, and
delete redundancy, along with a few edits for length and clarity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
We
live in a season of astonishing technological progress. Tools that once
belonged to science fiction now sit on our desks and in our pockets. Technology
can serve the church — and sometimes it does. Yet today I must speak plainly
about a temptation in our day: the temptation to outsource the work of
preaching the Word of God to Artificial Intelligence — to let a machine write
our sermons.
It is the temptation of efficiency, the allure of the
shortcut, the promise of a tool that can, with a few well-placed prompts, craft
something that looks and sounds like a sermon.
I want to be clear from the start: this is not a sermon
against using technology. Technology is a gift from God, and we see it used for
good in countless ways, from livestreaming services to digital Bibles. This is
a sermon about the nature of the Word itself and the sacred trust given to
those called to preach it.
The sermon is not merely a speech or a collection of words;
it is a medium through which God speaks to His people. It is a sacred act,
rooted in prayer, study, and the leading of the [Holy] Spirit. Today, we will
explore why entrusting this task to AI undermines the biblical principles of
preaching, the authenticity of the preacher’s calling, and the transformative
power of God’s Word.
The temptation to use AI assistance
for sermon preparation might seem practical, even reasonable. After all,
doesn’t AI have access to vast theological resources, commentaries, and
biblical knowledge?
It can process
the entirety of the Bible in a millisecond. It can cross-reference every
theological commentary ever written. But it cannot believe.
A sermon
written by AI, therefore, is a ghost. It has the shape of a sermon, it has the
words of a sermon, but it lacks the soul. It is a beautifully crafted report
about the Word, but it is not a living act of faith. And what our world
desperately needs is not more information about God, but a living
encounter with Him.
Preaching
is not a mere transfer of facts—it is the living communication of God’s truth,
spoken through a man with God’s Holy Spirit. When we look to shortcuts—whether
through [outright] sermon plagiarism or, in our modern day, through the
outsourcing of preaching to Artificial Intelligence—we tread on dangerous
ground. Preaching is holy, weighty, blood-bought work. It cannot be delegated to
[the ghost in the machine].
Today, we will explore the practice of
using AI to write sermons. This is not about rejecting technology entirely, but
about understanding the irreplaceable elements of authentic ministry that
cannot and should not be outsourced to machines.
THE CALL OF THE PREACHER
2Ti 4:1-5 NKJV
(1) I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom:
(2) Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching.
What does Scripture demand of those
called to preach? When Paul charges Timothy in our text with the solemn words,
“I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus,” he establishes
preaching not as mere information transfer, but as a sacred trust that requires
the whole person—heart, mind, soul, and spirit.
Can a machine carry the weight of God’s call? Can it wrestle
with the text as a human heart does? The answer is no, for preaching is not
just about words—it is about faithfully stewarding the message God entrusts to
His servants. What seems helpful may erode the foundations of our faith.
The preacher is not merely a
communicator; he is a [faithful] steward of [the] mysteries [of God]. (1
Corinthians 4:1–2)
Jas 3:1 NKJV My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.
Preachers
will give account to God, not only for how they lived, but for what they
preached. Every sermon carries eternal weight. Who then will answer for sermons
generated by machines? To delegate one’s sacred duty to a program is to stand
before God having abdicated responsibility.
Every
preacher must wrestle with the text, weep over the lost, pray for the Spirit’s
anointing, and stand accountable before heaven itself for what is proclaimed.
This duty cannot be shifted onto the shoulders of silicon and software. It
belongs to the preacher alone.
The
strict judgment that James warns about attaches to a human conscience that
responds to God. If a preacher lets a machine speak in his stead, who is truly
accountable before God and before the church? Using AI shifts accountability— who
answers for errors, the preacher or the program?
1Co 2:1-5 NKJV
(1) And I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God.
(2) For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.
(3) I was with you in weakness, in fear, and in much trembling.
(4) And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
(5) that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.
It is not about perfection but about faithfulness. God does
not call us to produce flawless sermons; He calls us to be faithful stewards of
His Word.
Paul
tells the Corinthians he did not come with “enticing words of man’s wisdom, but
in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power
of God.”
AI, no matter how advanced, cannot be filled with the Holy
Spirit. It cannot pray, seek God’s face, or discern His will for a specific
congregation. A sermon written by AI may sound polished, but it lacks the
divine spark that comes from a preacher’s communion with God. The Spirit moves
through human hearts that are surrendered to Him, not through algorithms that
process data.
In 2
Corinthians 4:7 NIV, Paul gives us a beautiful and profound image of
ministry: "But we have this treasure in jars of clay, to show that the
surpassing power belongs to God and not to us." The treasure is the
gospel. The jar of clay is the preacher—fragile, breakable, and utterly human. The
power, Paul insists, is not in the jar, but in the treasure, and the very
imperfection of the jar serves to highlight the glory of the treasure it holds.
The temptation to use AI is the temptation to build a better
jar—one that is flawless, efficient, and never fumbles for a word. But Paul’s
ministry was a testament to the power of a fumbling, flawed jar.
The power of Paul’s preaching was not in its eloquence. It
was in his weakness, his fear, and his trembling. His vulnerability allowed the
power of the Holy Spirit to be made manifest.
When a congregation
hears a sermon that bears the imprint of the preacher’s authentic life, they
sense the credibility of the message. Without that personal touch, the sermon
becomes a lecture rather than a shared pilgrimage.
Here
lies the line AI can never cross. It can assemble enticing words of man’s
wisdom. It can produce rhetorical elegance. But it cannot demonstrate the
Spirit and the power of God. It can inform, but it cannot transform. For the
things of God are spiritually discerned (1 Cor. 2:14), and a machine has no
spirit.
PERSONAL WRESTLING WITH GOD’S WORD
There’s a connection between preacher
and the sermon text. When the preacher hasn’t personally wrestled with the
passage, he cannot speak with the authority of one who has been transformed by
the text. The congregation senses this lack of personal engagement. They may
receive information, but they don’t receive the bread of life that comes from a
preacher who has first fed himself.
The
foundation of authentic preaching begins with the preacher’s personal encounter
with Scripture. Notice the progression in Ezra 7:10: study, do, then teach. It
is not just information-gathering; it is prayerful encounter.
Ezr 7:10 NKJV For Ezra had prepared his heart to seek the Law of the LORD, and to do it, and to teach statutes and ordinances in Israel.
This
wasn’t casual reading or surface-level research that could be accomplished by
consulting an AI database.
2Ti 2:15 KJV Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Paul’s
instruction to Timothy uses the Greek word “spoudazo,” meaning to make every
effort, to be eager, to give diligence, studying, meditating, and praying over
Scripture.
Scripture speaks personally before it
speaks generally. When a preacher struggles with a text—questioning, praying,
meditating—the message that emerges carries the authenticity of personal
spiritual battle.
The Holy Spirit works through human
vessels, not digital algorithms. Jesus promised, “But the Helper, the Holy
Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and
bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you” (John 14:26).
Personal wrestling produces spiritual
authority. The difference between a sermon written by AI and one birthed
through prayer and study is the difference between secondhand information and
firsthand revelation. AI, by its nature, lacks a soul. It cannot
experience the divine illumination. Nor can it be led by the Spirit of truth,
as Jesus promises in John 16:13: "But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes,
he will guide you into all the truth."
If we use
AI, we risk sermons devoid of vitality. They become echoes of human data, not
whispers from heaven. Imagine a preacher inputting keywords like
"faith" and "salvation," and out pops a polished message.
But where is the wrestling in prayer, the tears over sin, the joy of discovery?
Consider the process: A preacher sits
with an open Bible, perhaps struggling with a difficult passage. He reads
commentaries, yes, but ultimately must grapple with the text himself. He prays,
“Lord, what are you saying to me first, before I speak to others?” In that holy
tension between human limitation and divine revelation, the sermon is
conceived. This process shapes not only the message but the messenger.
The process of sermon preparation,
when done authentically, serves as a means of grace in the preacher’s life.
Consider the spiritual disciplines inherent in proper sermon preparation:
Prayer and Dependence on God: Before opening commentaries or
consulting resources, the faithful preacher must come before God in prayer,
acknowledging his need for divine illumination. “Open my eyes, that I may
behold wondrous things out of your law” (Psalm 119:18). This prayer of dependence
cannot be replicated by AI because it flows from genuine humility and
recognition of human limitation.
Meditation on Scripture: The Psalm 1 man meditates on God’s
law day and night. The Hebrew word for meditate (hagah) suggests a continuous,
ruminating process—like a cow chewing its cud. This deep, repetitive
consideration allows the Word to penetrate not just the mind but the heart.
When a preacher sits with a text, reading it repeatedly, thinking about it
while driving, praying over it before sleep, the text begins to work on the preacher
before the preacher works on the sermon.
Wrestling with Personal Application: Before a preacher can faithfully
apply a text to others, he must allow it to search his own heart. This personal
examination cannot be outsourced because it requires genuine self-reflection
and repentance.
Intercession for the Congregation: As the preacher prepares, he should
be praying for his people—their specific needs, struggles, and spiritual
condition. This intercession shapes not only the content of the sermon but its
tone, emphasis, and application. This pastoral heart cannot be replicated artificially.
When we use AI to write sermons, we
short-circuit this formative process. The result is not just an inferior
sermon, but a preacher who remains spiritually unchanged by his own message and
through him, the congregation—is bypassed in the name of efficiency.
When
we shortcut this process through AI assistance, we rob ourselves of the
transformative work that sermon preparation is meant to accomplish in the
preacher’s own soul. We become distributors of processed spiritual food rather
than shepherds who have tasted and seen that the Lord is good. (Psa 34:8)
RELIANCE ON GOD’S HOLY SPIRIT
Central to the task of preaching is the guidance of the Holy
Spirit. We must rely on the Holy Spirit, not human inventions like AI.
1 Corinthians 2:10-13 NIV: "The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God... We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us. This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit."
Here
we face the critical problem: Artificial Intelligence can generate words, but
it cannot generate Spirit-taught words. AI is like a mirror of human
knowledge—but preaching requires more than knowledge. It requires revelation,
illumination, conviction—all of which can only come through the Holy Spirit.
The process of
interpreting and applying Scripture requires spiritual discernment—a faculty
that belongs solely to believers who have been indwelt by the [Holy] Spirit. An
AI, however sophisticated, operates purely on pattern recognition and
statistical inference, algorithms fed on vast datasets, often biased by
secular worldviews; it lacks the Spirit’s illumination. Consequently, any sermon generated
by AI can never claim true inspiration; it remains a human‑crafted artifact
masquerading as divine counsel.
Artificial
Intelligence, at best, is a simulacrum [semblance] of human language patterns. It can
analyze texts, quote Scripture, assemble arguments, and mimic rhetorical forms.
But it has no Spirit. AI's "creativity" is derivative,
remixing human input without true innovation. Sermons should be fresh words
from God, not algorithmic echoes.
Even if an AI were fed countless sermons, it would lack the living presence
that makes a message transform lives. The Spirit’s timing, emphasis, and nuance
are beyond any algorithmic prediction.
The
power of preaching is not in polish but in presence—the Spirit’s presence
coming through a sanctified messenger. “For our gospel came not unto you in
word only, but also in power, and in the Holy [Spirit], and in much assurance”
(1 Thessalonians 1:5).
The
sufficiency for ministry flows from God: “Not that we are sufficient of
ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;
Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament” (2 Corinthians
3:5–6).
When
we shift our functional trust to the speed, novelty, or polish of a generated
sermon, we quietly confess another sufficiency. Tools may serve; they must
never supplant.
EFFICIENCY OVER FAITHFULNESS
The process of sermon preparation is a sacred discipline. It
is a journey of prayer, of meditation, and of diligent study. As we read and
reread the text, as we consult commentaries and theological resources, we are
not just gathering information; we are allowing the Holy Spirit to speak to us,
to challenge us, to transform us. This is a process of sanctification.
It is a spiritual discipline that shapes us as much as it
shapes the content we deliver. When we outsource this process, we are not just
saving time; we are sidestepping a crucial part of our spiritual formation.
David
reminds us in 2 Samuel
24:24 ESV [when he purchased the threshing floor to erect an altar]:
“I will not sacrifice to the Lord my God burnt offerings that cost me
nothing.”
Sermon
preparation is costly. A faithful preacher spends hours in the Word, days in
prayer, nights wrestling with God’s truth. There are tears of frustration when
the text feels closed and tears of joy when revelation breaks forth. This
effort costs something—time, energy, life itself.
AI
offers a shortcut. It says: “Save the time. Skip the wrestling. Here is
something polished and ready.” But if David would not offer God something that
cost him nothing, how dare we? To present to God’s people words concocted
without sacrifice is to dishonor both God and His flock.
The
church does not need efficiency. It needs faithfulness.
Using AI fosters laziness. 1 Timothy 5:17 honors elders
"who labor in preaching and teaching." AI is a lazy shortcut,
dishonoring God.
The parable of talents (Matthew 25:14-30) condemns the lazy
servant. Revelation 3:15-16 rebukes lukewarmness: "I know your deeds, that
you are neither cold nor hot... So, because you are lukewarm... I will spit you
out."
When God calls a man to preach, He
doesn’t merely assign him a job—He imparts a sacred trust.
DISCERNMENT NEEDED TO SIFT THE DATASET
Truth, especially divine
truth, is relational. It meets us where we are, speaks into our hearts, and
invites us into a covenant relationship with God. When we reduce Scripture to
searchable keywords or statistical probabilities, we strip it of its relational
depth. AI treats the Bible as a dataset, ignoring the living, breathing context
of the believer’s journey. The result is a sermon that may be factually correct
yet spiritually sterile—unable to illuminate the darkness of a soul or stir
genuine repentance.
AI systems learn from a
vast corpora, [body of work] but they also inherit the biases, errors, and
ambiguities present in those sources. A subtle shift in phrasing can change
theological meaning dramatically. Moreover, AI lacks the ability to discern
cultural, historical, and literary contexts that are essential for sound
exegesis. A misapplied verse can lead a congregation astray, cause doctrinal
confusion, or even foster heretical ideas. The preacher, trained in
hermeneutics and accountable to the church, must guard against such pitfalls.
AI
is trained on the world’s data; it reflects human opinions, half-truths, and
the confusions of the age. AI poses risks of error and dilution. Machines lack conscience; they
replicate pattern rather than covenant. AI, trained on global data, might
produce generic content that fails to resonate. This detachment could lead to
shallow faith.
AI may [even] draw from thousands of sermons, but it cannot
seek God’s face. It may mimic biblical language, but it cannot discern God’s
will. A sermon written by AI risks being a hollow echo of human words, not a
vessel of divine truth.
Col 2:8 KJV Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
AI algorithms are designed to please and cater to user
preferences.
The sermon must be prophetic, challenging worldly wisdom,
and not catering to "itching ears."
For the time is coming when people will not
endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for
themselves teachers to suit their own passions (2Ti
4:3 ESV)
The sermon is meant to be a moment of truth-telling, even if
that truth is uncomfortable. It is meant to challenge the world's wisdom and to
confront sin. It is meant to call people to a life of repentance and obedience.
The temptation for a human preacher, and a temptation that an AI could very
easily amplify, is to give people what they want to hear rather than
what they need to hear.
An AI, by its very design, is built on algorithms that seek
to please the user, to generate content that is most likely to be accepted and
enjoyed.
The gospel is not about consensus, but about a singular,
radical truth.
It is meant to be counter-cultural, to be a stumbling block
to the world.
WISE DISTINCTIONS: TOOLS AS RESOURCES NOT AS AUTHORS
Commentaries,
lexicons, historical helps, and even software can assist us. If AI is used as a research assistant — to
find historical background, to highlight linguistic questions, to suggest
references — and then the preacher prays over, edits, and personalizes that
material in a Spirit-led way, that is different from outsourcing the entire act
of proclamation.
Use
reference works to clarify difficult texts, to check outlines against the grain
of Scripture, to consult backgrounds—then go back to prayer, meditation, and writing
in your own voice.
The final
composition, theological framing, and pastoral application must remain the
preacher’s own work. After any technological assistance, pray
earnestly, seek the Spirit’s confirmation, and perhaps run the draft by trusted
elders for accountability.
Always
remember the baseline: the pulpit must be human, accountable, and Spirit-led.
Our Lord gave the church pastors and teachers “for the perfecting of the
saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ.” (Ephesians
4:11)
AUTHENTICITY AND INTEGRITY
Scripture
calls for faithfulness, not convenience. “We have renounced the hidden things
of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God
deceitfully” (2 Corinthians 4:2).
Test
everything by Scripture and conscience. “Prove all things; hold fast that which
is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Let the Spirit-trained conscience keep you
from handing holy things to impersonal hands.
God calls His messengers to speak His Word faithfully, not to
rely on artificial substitutes. An AI-generated sermon may sound impressive,
but it lacks the fire of God’s truth spoken through a faithful heart.
Jer 23:30-36 NRSV
(30) See, therefore, I am against the prophets, says the LORD, who steal my words from one another.
(31) See, I am against the prophets, says the LORD, who use their own tongues and say, "Says the LORD."
(32) See, I am against those who prophesy lying dreams, says the LORD, and who tell them, and who lead my people astray by their lies and their recklessness, when I did not send them or appoint them; so they do not profit this people at all, says the LORD.
(36) But "the burden of the LORD" you shall mention no more, for the burden is everyone's own word, and so you pervert the words of the living God.
Is
that not what AI does? It steals phrases, recombines sentences, producing words
as though they carried authority. It “wags its tongue” with borrowed wisdom.
But God did not send it. He did not appoint it. And how dangerous it would be
to put counterfeit words in the mouths of God’s people as though they were
Spirit-breathed.
The pulpit must never echo with artificial words. The
pulpit rings hollow if its words are not weighted with the burden of a human
heart and the power of God’s Spirit.
Preaching
must draw from the fountain of living waters, not from systems that repackage
what they have gathered secondhand.
CONCLUSION
This is not a call to reject all
technology or helpful resources. Commentaries, concordances, theological works,
and even digital tools can serve as valuable aids in sermon preparation. The
crucial distinction is between tools that assist human study and systems that
replace human spiritual labor.
The question each preacher must answer
is not whether AI can produce acceptable sermons—it probably can. The question
is whether using AI to write sermons fulfills the biblical mandate to “preach
the word”.
When we stand before Christ to give
account of our stewardship, will we be able to say with Paul, “I did not shrink
from declaring to you the whole counsel of God” ? (Acts 20:27) Or will we have
to acknowledge that we delegated this sacred responsibility to artificial
systems?
So,
I urge you: Preach the Word. Preach it when it is hard, preach it when
it is costly, preach it when you feel weary. Preach it when the world says a
machine could do it better. Preach it with trembling, with weakness, with
tears, with joy. But preach it in the power of the Holy Spirit.
1 Timothy 4:13-16 ESV - “Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation, to teaching. Do not neglect the gift that is in you, which was given you by prophecy when the council of elders laid their hands on you. Practice these things; immerse yourself in them, so that all may see your progress. Keep a close watch on yourself and on your teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.”
Paul’s final charge to Timothy
provides a fitting conclusion to our consideration of why preachers should not
use AI to write sermons. Notice the intensely personal nature of Paul’s
instructions:
“Devote yourself” - The Greek word (prosecho) means to
turn one’s mind to, to occupy oneself with, to give attention to. This devotion
cannot be outsourced or automated. It requires personal investment of time,
energy, and spiritual focus.
“Do not neglect the gift that is in
you”
- Timothy’s spiritual gift was given specifically to him through prophetic
ministry and the laying on of hands. This gift required cultivation and
exercise. (Heb 5:14) Using AI to write sermons would represent a fundamental
neglect of the spiritual gifts God has given to each preacher.
“Practice these things; immerse
yourself in them”
- The call to practice and immersion suggests ongoing, intensive engagement.
“Keep a close watch on yourself and on
your teaching”
- This vigilant attention requires personal responsibility that cannot be
delegated to artificial systems. The preacher must guard both his character and
his doctrine through personal spiritual discipline.
Paul’s final promise to Timothy is
significant: “Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself
and your hearers.” The word “persist” (epimeno) suggests continuing
steadfastly despite difficulty. The promise is twofold—both preacher and people
benefit from this authentic perseverance.
The choice before every preacher is
clear: Will we embrace the difficult but transformative work of authentic
sermon preparation, or will we take the shortcut that promises efficiency but
delivers spiritual poverty? Shortcuts—whether stealing another’s sermon or
outsourcing to AI—undermines the sacred calling.
Let us open our Bibles, get on our knees, and allow God to
speak to us first, so that we might then speak His living and powerful Word to
a world in desperate need.
Preach
the Word—prayerfully,
faithfully, sacrificially.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------