Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The 40 Days of Weeping for Tammuz (Lent)

Search the scriptures diligently, from Old Testament to New, and you will find no mention of Jews or Christians observing an annual period of 40 days of fasting and abstinence preceding the festival of the Passover, yet today most of the Christian world observes a 40 day period called Lent, which precedes the festival of Easter Sunday.

So, if the Bible does not enjoin the Jew or the Christian to observe the 40 day period called Lent, then what is its origin? Can the answer be found in the Catholic Church?

540 ... "For we have not a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tested as we are, yet without sinning" [Heb 4:15]. By the solemn forty days of Lent the Church unites herself each year to the mystery of Jesus in the desert.
Source: The Catechism of the Catholic Church, copyright 1994 by the United States Catholic Conference, Inc., published by Liquori Publications.

Lent is the 40-day period (Sundays excluded) prior to Easter, which the church observes as a penitential season. It begins on Ash Wednesday (which can occur any time between February 4 and March 11, depending upon the date of Easter), and it concludes with the Passiontide, the two-week period during which the church's liturgy follows Christ's activity closely through the final stages of his life on earth. These two weeks are called Passion Week and Holy Week. It was once claimed that the Lenten practice was of apostolic origin, but historians fix its establishment at a later date, probably the 5th century. Catholics are required to fast and are urged to adopt other penitential modes during the season.
The Catholic Fact Book, copyright 1986 by John Deedy, published by Thomas More Press, page 360.

Lent is the period of six and one half weeks from Ash Wednesday to Easter Sunday. During Lent, for 40 days, excluding Sundays, fasting is recommended for all Catholics according to the laws of fast. This is reminiscent of the 40 days of our Lord's unbroken fast (Mt. 4:3-4). The entire period of Lent is also a time of spiritual preparation for the passion, death, and resurrection of Christ. It is observed as a time of penitence other than fasting, and as a time of prayer. The Liturgy of the Church reflects the significance of this period of spiritual preparation: each day has a special Mass assigned to it; those Masses date back to the seventh and eighth centuries; there are no feasts observed on Sundays; purple vestments are the daily color...
It [Ash Wednesday] was established as the first day of Lent by [Pope] St. Gregory the Great (590 to 604).
Source: The Catholic Encyclopedia, revised and updated, edited by Robert Broderick, copyright 1987, published by Thomas Nelson Publishers

The reasons for celebrating our major feasts when we do are many and varied. In general, however, it is true that many of them have at least an indirect connection with the pre-Christian [pagan] feasts celebrated about the same time of year -- feasts centering around the harvest, the rebirth of the sun at the winter solstice (now Dec. 21, but Dec. 25 in the old Julian calendar), the renewal of nature in spring, and so on.
Source: The New Question Box -- Catholic Life for the Nineties, copyright 1988 by John J. Dietzen, M.A., S.T.L., ISBN 0-940518-01-5 (paperback), published by Guildhall Publishers, Peoria Illinois, 61651., page 554.

The observance of Lent dates back to the Apostles.
MYTH ... In the fifth century, some Fathers claimed that Lent was of apostolic institution, but the claim is doubtful. From the earliest Christian times everyone agreed that a penitential season should preceed the solemnities of Easter, but for at least three centuries there was no agreement over how long that should be. Saint Irenaeus, writing around the year 190, clued to the diversity of opinion, saying: "some think they ought to fast for one day, others for two days, and others even for several, while other reckon forty hours both of day and night to their fast." Apparently he knew nothing about any Lent or pre-Easter fast of forty days, else he would have mentioned it.
In the fourth century Saint Athanasius enjoined the people of Alexandria to observe a forty day period of fasting prior to Easter, indicating that this was the mode now practiced throughout Christendom." ... [W]hile all the world is fasting, we who are in Egypt should not become a laughing stock as the only people who do not fast but take pleasure in those days." Athanasius wrote. The year was 339, and Athanasius was recently back from a trip to Europe, including Rome.
Some sources allege that the forty-day Lent was not known in the West until the time of Saint Ambrose (c339-397). The date of Athanasius' letter would seem to negate that theory.
So, no, our Lent does not date from the time of the Apostles. But apparently it was observed before the year 339. That's early enough.
Source: Facts, Myths & Maybes (Everything You Think You Know About Catholicism But Perhaps Don't), by John Deedy, copyright 1993, published by Thomas More Press, page 235.

So according to Catholics, Lent is derived from the 40 days Yeshua spent fasting in the wilderness, but it is admitted that the observance of Lent was unknown to the disciples and it did not find its way into the church until several centuries after the time of the Messiah. It should be noted that the 40 days of fasting in the wilderness preceded the earthly ministry of the Messiah, which lasted some three years, and was not connected in any way to his crucifixion or the Passover.
Now from non-Catholic sources, a little more information:
"It ought to be known," said Cassianus, the monk of Marseilles, writing in the fifth century, and contrasting the primitive Church with the Church in his day, "that the observance of the forty days had no existence, so long as the perfection of that primitive Church remained inviolate."
Source: Gieseler, vol. ii. p. 42, Note. Cited in The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop, page 104.

Many Christians had already reserved a period prior to Easter for fasting, confession, and schooling candidates for baptism on Easter Eve. But the time frame was never fixed, rules never formalized. Different groups of Christians followed different customs -- some fasted for several days, others several weeks. Some observed a total fast for exactly forty days (minus the Lord's day, Sunday), a feast called Quadragesima, which would evolve into Lent.
Thus, by mid-fourth century, the duration of Lent -- the word itself means "lengthening spring days," from the Indo-European langat-tin, "long"+ "day" -- became more or less fixed at forty days, less Sundays; the time frame did not become official, though, until the eighth century.
In the Western Church today, Lent begins six and a half weeks before Easter, providing forty fast days when Sundays are excluded. In the Eastern Church, however, Lent begins eight weeks before Easter, since fasting is excluded on Saturdays and Sundays. Today, too, a fast can be as slight an inconvenience as abstaining from chocolate or ice cream for the duration. A token fast.
Source: Sacred Origins of Profound Things, by Charles Panati, copyright 1996, published by the Penguin Group, page 206.

Whence, then, came this observance? The forty days abstinence of Lent was directly borrowed from the worshippers of the Babylonian goddess [Astarte / Ishtar]. Such a Lent of forty days, "in the spring of the year," is still observed by the Yezidis or Pagan Devil-worshippers of Koordistan, who have inherited it from their early masters, the Babylonians.
Such a Lent of forty days was held in spring by the Pagan Mexicans, for thus we read in Humboldt, where he gives account of Mexican observances: "Three days after the vernal equinox .... began a solemn fast of forty days in the honour of the sun."
Such a Lent of forty days was observed in Egypt, as may be seen on consulting Wilkinson's Egyptians.
Among the Pagans this Lent seems to have been an indispensible preliminary to the great annual festival in commemoration of the death and resurrection of Tammuz, which was celebrated by alternate weeping and rejoicing, and which, in many countries, was considerably later than the Christian festival, being observed in Palestine and Assyria in June, therefore called the "month of Tammuz;" in Egypt, about the middle of May, and in Britain, some time in April. To conciliate the Pagans to nominal Christianity, Rome, pursuing its usual policy, took measures to get the Christian and Pagan festivals amalgamated, and, by a complicated but skillful adjustment of the calendar, it was found no difficult matter, in general, to get Paganism and Christianity -- now far sunk in idolatry -- in this as in so many other things, to shake hands.
Originally, even in Rome, Lent, with the preceding revelries of the Carnival, was entirely unknown; and even when fasting before the Christian Pasch was held to be necessary, it was by slow steps that, in this respect, it came to conform with the ritual of Paganism. What may have been the period of fasting in the Roman Church before the sitting of the Nicene Council does not very clearly appear, but for a considerable period after that Council, we have distinct evidence that it did not exceed three weeks. The words of Socrates, writing on this very subject, about A.D. 450, are these: "Those who inhabit the princely city of Rome fast together before Easter three weeks, excepting the Saturday and Lord's day." But at last, when the worship of Astarte was rising into the ascendant, steps were taken to get the whole Chaldean Lent of six weeks, or forty days, made imperative on all within the Roman empire of the West. The way was prepared for this by a Council held at Aurelia in the time of Hormisdas, Bishop of Rome [514-523], about the year 519, which decreed that Lent should be solemnly kept before Easter. It was with the view, no doubt, of carrying out this decree that the calendar was, a few days after, readjusted by Dionysius.
Source: The Two Babylons, by Alexander Hislop, second American edition, 1959, published in America by Loizeaux Brothers, pages 106, 107.

Legend has it that Tammuz was killed by a wild boar when he was forty years old. Hislop points out that forty days--a day for each year Tammuz had lived on earth -- were set aside to "weep for Tammuz." In olden times these forty days were observed with weeping, fasting, and self chastisement -- to gain anew his favor -- so he would come forth from the underworld and cause spring to begin. This observance was known not only at Babylon, but also among the Phoenicians, Egyptians, Mexicans, and, for a time, even among the Israelites.
Source: Babylon Mystery Religion, by Ralph Edward Woodrow, Copyright 1966, 1992 printing, page 139.

So the 40 days of Lent is connected with the Babylonian goddess Ashtoreth / Astarte / Ishtar (the origin of the word Easter), and the worship of Tammuz. Unlike Lent, both of these can be found in scripture:
Ezek 8:14-16 Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD'S house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. (15) Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these. (16) And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD'S house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east.

2 Ki 23:5
And he [King Josiah] put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.

2 Ki 23:11-13
And he [King Josiah] took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sun, at the entering in of the house of the LORD, by the chamber of Nathanmelech the chamberlain, which was in the suburbs, and burned the chariots of the sun with fire. (12) And the altars that were on the top of the upper chamber of Ahaz, which the kings of Judah had made, and the altars which Manasseh had made in the two courts of the house of the LORD, did the king beat down, and brake them down from thence, and cast the dust of them into the brook Kidron. (13) And the high places that were before Jerusalem, which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtoreth the abomination of the Zidonians, and for Chemosh the abomination of the Moabites, and for Milcom the abomination of the children of Ammon, did the king defile.
Baal, Tammuz, Ashtoreth, Astarte and Ishtar are all connected with pagan sun worship. Note that Lent is a moveable observance, connected to and preceding the festival of Easter. Easter is celebrated on a day specified only by the Roman Catholic Church, and not the Bible, and is fixed based on the sun and the Spring or Vernal equinox.

Would you give up Christ for Lent?


Saturday, February 6, 2010

What do you deserve today?

So often today we are urged to indulge ourselves in some sinful pleasure with the persuasive enticement that we somehow deserve it. You've worked hard, you deserve a break today. You've been under a lot of stress lately, you deserve a weekend retreat at our spa. Treat yourself, pamper yourself, be good to yourself. When you turn your car on, does it return the favor? Why shouldn't you surround yourself in luxury? Buy a "BMCaddiLexucedes", you've earned it. Dare I say, you deserve it!

But what is it we really deserve? Are we here merely to strive for a life of ease in luxurious surroundings only to die later and bequeath what's leftover by then to our children? Studying God's word can help us keep it all in perspective. This short story about a lowly Canaanite woman's request of the Son of God demonstrates.
Mat 15:21-28 Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon. (22) And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. (23) But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. (24) But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. (25) Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. (26) But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. (27) And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table. (28) Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

After reading this passage I was puzzled and somewhat perplexed as to why Jesus treated this woman the way He did. Not only did He refuse her request at first but later in the exchange He referred to her as a "dog".
What was Christ most concerned with when He arrived on the scene in Jerusalem? The Jews had taken the law of Moses which was really God's law and turned it into little more than a scorecard, a checklist really. They had totally missed the point! God wants us to obey him because we want to, not in a sense of having to because we're being coerced. He wants obedience from the heart not the head obeying the spirit of the law not just the letter of it. (Heb 10:16)

This woman was a Canaanite and thusly a Gentile. Jesus did not come to expressly minister to the Gentiles rather leaving this task to Paul. He came to minister, as He said, to the house of Israel. Being from the coast of Tyre and Sidon, she was from an area known for its worship of the pagan god, Baal. It would be highly likely then that her daughter would indeed be inhabited by an evil spirit. As a location of unscrupulous practices, it would not have been unusual for someone from there to approach Jesus with an attitude of trying to get something for nothing from Him. In other words, get what she can from him so she can be about her business. "If He is indeed the great healer He is purported to be then let's see if He'll heal my daughter." While Christ may have known her heart, those standing by would certainly not have known. In fact, the disciples asked that Jesus quickly heal her so she would leave them alone. Christ, of course, handles it perfectly, teaching His disciples and us a valuable lesson.

The woman's first request to heal her daughter was ignored by Jesus. She recognizes his stature in the community as a Jew and even further as the Son of David, of royal heritage.
Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David
It was not apparent though whether this was a true sign of reverence or just a ploy to flatter Him, butter Him up so to speak before making her request. Why did He ignore her at the beginning? Maybe he was trying her faith to see how strong it was or demonstrating to bystanders that the pearl of great price was not given to just anyone. He may also have been eliciting a demonstration of the effect of persevering supplication. Either way, it serves as an effectual example for us.

The disciples were annoyed and suggested her request be granted if for no other reason than to just get rid of her.
Send her away; for she crieth after us
Christ's response has dual meaning - 1. that He will not be goaded into exercising the power of God to merely alleviate a nuisance and 2. at that time He was sent to the house of Israel first and such requests from others would be considered on a case by case basis.
I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
The woman threw herself at Jesus' feet humbling herself, did him reverence and cried out a proper cry for a poor sinner signifying that her case required it; that it was such, that she could not help herself, nor any creature help her, only He, in whom she firmly believed.
Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.

It might be helpful to know how the Jews of that time viewed the Gentiles. As the specially chosen ones of God, the Jews looked down on all who were not so chosen as mere dogs. Even though the Jews were only perfunctorily following a righteousness checklist and were not really any more worthy than those they detested, they still looked down their noses at the uncircumcised as lowly "infidels". Dogs of that time were not cared for once they were full-grown. Puppies though, lingered around the master's table in hopes of picking up any scraps that might fall to the floor. Once they became adults, they were turned out to fend for themselves, begging on the streets and eating whatever garbage they could find only occasionally being fed at home. So to refer to someone as a "dog" was quite an insult.

But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
The woman persisted, humbly accepting her "dog" status that even as such she was willing to settle for even the crumbs of Christ's mercy. Let it be that the best food should be given to your children - let the House of Israel have the chief benefit of thy ministry; but the dogs beneath the table eat the crumbs. So let me be regarded as a dog, a pagan, as unworthy of everything. Yet grant one exertion of Thy almighty power displayed so signally among your children, and heal the despised daughter of a despised heathen mother.
And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.
That is, her trust, confidence, and belief was great. The word here seems to include, also, the humility, gratitude and perseverance manifested in pressing her suit. Jesus' reward is for those that demonstrate obedience, trust and humility and seek Him in truth and sincerity.

Let's not talk about what we deserve or entertain thoughts of self-aggrandizement but rather of humility and gratitude. The word "deserve" can be broken down into two syllables "de-serve" as in "un-serve" or "not-serve". In other words, the opposite of serve as we're instructed by our Lord Jesus. What we deserve is death on a cross and anything we receive better than that is by the grace and mercy of the Lord our God and Jesus Christ. For it is by His sacrifice we are saved.



Who Am I

My photo
I strive to be as the Bereans spoken of in Acts 17:10-11 receiving the word with all readiness of mind, and searching the scriptures daily, whether those things are so. Check up on me in your own bible. Should you find me in error please let me know immediately. We must prove all things (1Thes 5:21) and rightly divide the word of truth (2Tim 2:15) together lest we be deceived. (Matt 24:24)

Get the Bible for your computer FREE!

Share Walk In Truth

Bookmark and Share

Tweets of Truth

Micah 6:8 He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?

Walk in Truth